You set the direction. You can see where the business needs to go, and you're moving toward it at the speed the moment requires.

You're also the only one moving at that speed.

Your leadership team is behind you. Slower than the shift calls for, hesitant, some of them clearly waiting to see whether this is real before they commit.

And you're carrying the whole thing forward mostly by yourself, on top of everything else the change already demands of you.

So you start reaching for an explanation. Two show up almost every time.

The first is that they're resistant. They liked things the way they were, and they don't want to move.

The second is that they're not capable. The business grew past them, and they can't do what it needs now.

Both might be true. But those are different problems with different answers.

And I've watched this over and over: leaders reach a conclusion long before they've done the work that would tell them if either of these are even right.

What you're really asking of them

When the business changes, you say the team has to change, and everyone nods. At the big-picture level, they know. They've heard the vision.

But two different things have to be made clear, and most leaders deliver a piece of the first and almost none of the second.

The first is the frame. Where the business is going. Why, in terms that actually matter to them and not just to you. And what they specifically stand to gain from making the move, beyond keeping their job.

The second is the part that's harder to say and easier to skip. What changes for them, specifically, on a Tuesday.

Three things usually shift at once.

How they make decisions. The call they used to make on their own now belongs to the team they're supposed to be building. Their job becomes developing the judgment in others, not supplying it themselves.

What they're accountable for. They used to be measured on what they personally produced. Now it's the outcome of their whole function, and the skills that made them a great individual contributor aren't the ones being asked of them anymore.

A capability they don't yet have. Almost always there's a real gap. Leading through others, reading the financials, thinking a stage ahead. Something they'll have to close, not just decide to be better at.

That's the ask. And it's enormous.

You're telling someone that the specific things that made them good here are the things they now have to set down, and then asking them to build something they've never built. Most of the time, nobody has said any of it to them that plainly.

So they don't experience it as a clear instruction. They experience it as a vague sense that what used to earn praise now earns concern, and they can't tell why.

You know exactly what's different, because you've been living inside the shift. From where they sit, they're being asked to move toward something they can't quite see themselves in yet.

It's still your change. It hasn't been made theirs.

---

The fast conclusion is the expensive one

When you're stretched thin, concluding feels like relief. Deciding "they're resistant" or "they can't do it" lets you stop wrestling and start acting. It feels like momentum.

It's usually the most expensive move available to you, and it costs the organization in three directions at once.

The first cost is happening right now, while you decide.

A leadership team that can't operate at the level the business needs is a bottleneck, and the whole organization feels it. Decisions stall waiting on people who aren't ready to make them. The layers below sit stuck, watching the hesitation at the top and slowing to match it.

Everything moves at the pace of the people who haven't made the shift.

The second cost comes when you conclude too fast and move the wrong person out.

I watched a company go through a major transformation and let go of someone genuinely brilliant, on the read that he wasn't right for where things were headed.

He left, started his own business, and it took off in a way that made it very clear the ability was never the problem. They didn't have a capability issue with him. They had a translation issue, and they resolved it by losing him.

The third cost is the opposite mistake.

During one integration, none of this foundational work happened, and a leader who should have been moved much earlier got carried for more than a year. Not out of confidence. Out of avoidance.

And the entire organization paid for it, because progress everywhere throttled down to the pace of the one person who was never going to make the turn. Everyone could see it.

So you can lose the person you should have kept. Keep the person you should have moved. And slow the whole organization the entire time you're not deciding.

That's what guessing costs.

The work that earns you the answer

Before you're entitled to conclude anything, there's work, and it isn't a speech.

You make the change real, person by person. The frame first: where you're going, why it matters to them, what they gain. Then the specifics: what's actually different in how they operate now, what you expect, and an honest read on what they'd have to grow into, including the capabilities they don't have yet.

Then you give them a real chance to meet it, with support behind it. Not just a standard and a deadline.

Here's what makes that worth the effort, rather than just the decent thing to do. When you actually do it, one of two things gets clear, and both of them move you forward.

Either the person rises. They were never resistant or incapable. They just couldn't see the path, and once they could, they moved. The bottleneck clears, and you keep the leader you were about to give up on.

Or it becomes undeniable.

Even with everything made clear and every support in place, they can't or won't make the change. And now you can move on it with confidence instead of guilt, knowing you didn't discard someone you could have kept. At that point, keeping them is the expensive choice, and you'll know it cleanly.

Here's the part that's easy to miss when you're overwhelmed and want it to just get easier.

Doing it this way is the thing that makes it easier.

The slow, deliberate work is what actually speeds you up, because on the other side of it you're not guessing, you're not carrying a bottleneck, and you're not managing the drag of a team half-moving in the same direction. You have a plan, you have confidence you're making the right calls, and the work starts moving at the pace you needed all along.

That's the relief you're actually after. Not the team suddenly getting easier, but the clarity and the momentum that come from finally doing the thing you kept hoping you could skip.

Until next time,

Kayla

P.S. You already have more on your plate than most people see, and you're making more calls in a week than most people make in a month. This particular one, getting your leadership team where the business needs them to be, is not one you have to work out alone.

It's exactly the kind of thing I help leaders think through and navigate, so you're not the only one holding it. If that would help, reach out and we'll talk.